TRANSMITTER STEERING IN VOTING SYSTEMS Prior Art Database Disclosure Disclosure Number: IPCOM000008363D
Publication Date: 01-Dec-1997
Find Similar Download

Publishing Venue

Motorola Technical Bulletins

Related People

Reinhard Seiler - Author [+4] [-4]
J├╝rgen Schmidt - Author
Norbert Roettger - Author
Bo Filt Jensen - Author
Benny Christensen - Author


This paper describes an improved method for reliable transmitter steering functionality in multi- site RF communication systems.


Motorola Inc. December 1997


English (United States)


United States

Document File

3 pages / 127.2 KB

This text was extracted from a PDF file.
At least one non-text object (such as an image or picture) has been suppressed.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 50% of the total text.

Page 1 of 3

0 M

MOTOROLA Technical Developments


by Reinhard Seiler, Jikgen Schmidt, Norbert Roettger,

Bo Filt Jensen and Benny Christensen


  This paper describes an improved method for reliable transmitter steering functionality in multi- site RF communication systems.


  Total Area Coverage systems are normally con- figured using several simulcast transmitters-which are quite expensive due to the required High Stability Oscillators-,a certain number of receivers, and the voting unit (eg. MOTOROLA Digitac). For nearly all applications, a cheaper transmitter steering technique would be preferred.

  It is, however, a problem to vote reliably the transmitter to be activated, if only the received sub- scriber audio signal to noise (S/N) is the criterion for this selection, due to the non-linear relationship of RF signal level to the received audio S/N. Especially under good RF conditions it is an often observed effect that small tolerances in the receiver (RX) adjustment results in any station being voted, but not necessarily the one that is closest to the rele- vant subscriber unit. Hence, the system does not operate optimally.


A comparator votes a site depending upon the measured noise energy in the subscriber audio

signal. As the signal to noise (S/N) ratio decreases, the high frequency content increases. The channel with the least amount of high frequency energy is then voted. It is imperative for this method of voting that all input channels show exactly the same behaviour. The Telco lines connecting the receivers to the voting unit must be checked for proper ampli- tude and phase response, the receiver discriminators must be of good quality and properly aligned, and all leased line interfaces in the path must be equalized.

  The input stage of the voter (refeer to Figure I) consists of a wireline receiver with automatic gain control (AGC), a high pass filter, a low pass filter, a level detector, and a peak detector. The received signal presented to the voter is impedance matched at POINT A. The gain of the AGC stage is set by the level of a status tone, typically 13 dB below peak audio. Since the AGC output level...

First page image
Due to scheduled site updates, and all related websites (including Prior Art publishing as well as Pantros IP) will be unavailable on Sunday, September 21st, starting at 2:00PM EDT and lasting for up to 4 hours.

We thank you for your patience and apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause.
There may be a charge to download this document but you are authorized to receive it free.
Files available for download:
  • a representative PDF of the primary file (contains all the relevant information for most users)
  • the full document ZIP file containing the primary file, packaged metadata, and attachments (as appropriate)
To obtain the file, please enter the "captcha" below and click the Download button.
Avoid entering CAPTCHAs! Sign In or Create a Free Account.

Challenge image
  • Please enter letters and numbers only; no spaces.
  • Cannot read this one? Click the image.
  • Difficulty with captchas? Contact us with the URL of this page and we will email it to you.