Dye-based ink (09-Mar-2010)

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/400,131 filed Mar. 25, 2003 and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/610,922 filed Sep. 17, 2004.

BACKGROUND

Ink jet printing is generally a non-impact method for producing images by the deposition of ink droplets in a pixel-by-pixel manner to an image-recording element in response to digital signals.

The inks used in the various ink jet printers can be classified as either dye-based or pigment-based. A dye is a colorant, which is dissolved in the carrier medium. A pigment is a colorant that is insoluble in the carrier medium, but tends to be dispersed/suspended in the form of small particles, often stabilized against flocculation and settling by the use of dispersing agents. Pigment-based inks are generally considered to be less stable than dye-based inks. The carrier medium can be a liquid or a solid at room temperature in both cases. Commonly used carrier media include water, mixtures of water and organic co-solvents and high boiling organic solvents, such as hydrocarbons, esters, ketones, etc.

Plain paper is generally used to refer to paper that has not been specially coated or designed for specialty uses. Plain paper is generally composed of cellulose fibers and fillers. In many cases, fillers tend to be anistropic to the flow of ink and generally have little effect on wicking. However, when ink travels along and through cellulose fibers the flow tends to be directional, and, if a dye is deposited along the way, either through bonding at active sites or evaporation of the solvents, it is seen as wicking. Dye-based inks where the dye tends to penetrate into the paper and/or wick, tend to result in low optical density and/or ragged edges.

Pigment-based inks tend not to have the same problems as dye-base inks when printed on plain paper. Pigment-based inks have been formed which can create a high print quality (PQ) on plain paper. Due to the fact that pigment-based inks have been found to provide higher print quality than traditional dye-based inks, traditional wisdom has been that inks requiring a high print quality (typically black inks) should be pigment-based inks. One such high print quality pigment-based ink is sold by Hewlett Packard under the trade-name HP 56 black ink jet print cartridge for the Deskjet 5550, product # C6656AN.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a fluid deposition system including a fluid supply media according to one exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a graph of optical density achieved by inks of various formulations; and

FIG. 3 is a comparison of print quality of an exemplary dye-based ink according to the disclosure, a pigment-based ink having a high print quality, and a traditional dye-based ink.

DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

According to many embodiments disclosed herein, a dye-based ink may be formed which exhibits a high print quality on plain paper. Further, many of these embodiments provide inks having at least a similar print quality on plain paper as those pigment-based inks demonstrating high print quality (i.e. the dye-based inks have a print quality that is substantially the same as or better than the print quality of the high print quality pigment-based inks).

Print quality generally refers to various properties of the ink including the thinness of the lines printable using the ink, the optical density of the ink, and edge acuity/sharpness. Relative print quality may be determined by printing a common image using two or more different types of inks and comparing the quality of the images. Print quality may be judged with reference to a standard such as a laser printer image.

According to some embodiments, a dye-based ink is provided which has a high optical density on plain paper. According to some embodiments, the dye-based ink has an optical density of at least about 1.3. According to some of these embodiments, the ink has an optical density of at least 1.4 or at least about 1.45. According to some of these embodiments, the ink has an optical density of at least about 1.5.

According to many embodiments, the dye-based ink comprises a solvent and a dye. The dye-based ink may also comprise surfactants, humectants, biocides, anti-kogation agents, buffers, and/or other additives.

Many dye-based inks include water as a solvent, and may also include a cosolvent. Cosolvents used in dye-based inks tend to be organic cosolvents. According to some embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 20 wt. % cosolvent. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 16 wt. % cosolvent. According to some embodiments, the ink may comprise at least about 5 wt. % cosolvent. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise at least about 8 wt. % cosolvent. According to one embodiment, the ink comprises about 10 wt. % to about 16 wt. % cosolvent.

The cosolvent used in the ink may be selected based on polarity, where polarity generally refers to the sum of the molecular properties responsible for the interaction forces between cosolvent and solute molecules. Polarity may be measured for a cosolvent based on its E_T(30) value. For a more detailed description of this parameter, see “Solvents and Solvent effects in organic chemistry,” second edition by C. Reichardt. For reference, water generally has an E_T(30) value of 63 kcal/mol and most diols and glycols tend to have E_T(30) values of about 50 to 55.

In some embodiments, a cosolvent may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of no more than about 45 kcal/mol. In some embodiments of the ink, each of the cosolvents or molecules which may serve as cosolvents in the ink has an E_T(30) value of no more than about 45 kcal/mol.

According to some embodiments, a cosolvent may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of at least about 25 kcal/mol. According to some of these embodiments, a cosolvent may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of at least about 30 kcal/mol or at least about 35 kcal/mol. In some embodiments, all of the cosolvent (which may include one or more different types of cosolvent), or molecules which may serve as cosolvent, that is present in the ink would meet one or more of the previously listed E_T(30) value parameters. Specifically, every cosolvent present in the ink may have an E_T(30) value of at least about 25 kcal/mol. According to some of these embodiments, each cosolvent present in the ink may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of at least about 30 kcal/mol or at least about 35 kcal/mol.

Some exemplary cosolvents which may be used for a dye-based ink having a high print quality may include 2-pyrrolidinone, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone, 3-pyridylcarbinol, 4-pyridylcarbinol, 3-(3-pyridylamino)-propionitrile, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-morpholine, 4-hydroxy-1-methyl-piperidine, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)morpholine, and combinations thereof. These cosolvents are believed to have E_T(30) values in the ranges discussed above and may be present in amounts as discussed above.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/400,131 titled SOLVENT SYSTEMS FOR INK-JET INKS, filed on Mar. 25, 2003, relates to inks having improved decap, recovery, and color attributes. The disclosure of this application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the extent that it is consistent with the present disclosure.

In addition to the cosolvent, the dye-based ink comprises a dye. According to some embodiments the ink may comprise at least about 0.1 wt. % dye. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise at least about 1 wt. % or at least about 2 wt. % dye. According to some embodiments the ink may comprise up to about 10 wt. % dye. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 6 wt. % dye.

According to some embodiments, the dye may comprise an anionic dye. According to some embodiments, the dye may comprise an azo-dye (including dis- and trisazo), phthalocyanine dye, and/or xanthene dye, and may be sulfonated, carboxylated, and/or metallized. Exemplary dyes which may be used include Direct Black 168, Projet Fast Black, and/or Projet Cyan 1, all available from Avecia; and/or Acid Red 52 available from Warner Jenkins.

An ink according to some embodiments may comprise a black dye and may be a black ink. In other embodiments, the ink is a non-black ink.

According to some embodiments the ink may comprise surfactants. In some embodiments, the surfactant may be anionic or non-ionic and may be a high HLB surfactant. Exemplary surfactants include polymeric alkoxylates (e.g. Solsperse 2000 from The Lubrizol Corporation), secondary alcohol ethoxylates (e.g., Tergitol series available from Union Carbide Co.), fluoro surfactants (such as FC170C available from 3M), fatty acid ethoxylate surfactants (e.g., Alkamul PSMO-20 available from Rhone-Poulenc), fatty amide ethoxylate surfactants (e.g., Aldamide L203 available from Rhone-Poulenc), amine oxide surfactants, sulfonyl surfactants, and diphenyl sulfonate derivatives.

According to some embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 1 wt. % surfactant. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 0.5 wt. % or up to about 0.25 wt. % surfactant. According to some embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 1 wt. % high HLB surfactant. According to some of these embodiments, the ink may comprise up to about 0.5 wt. % or up to about 0.25 wt. % high HLB surfactant. The HLB (hydrophilic-lipophilic balance) value empirically quantifies the balance between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts of a surfactant molecule in terms of both size and strength. HLB values of nonionic surfactants range from 1 to 40, with lower values indicating greater solubility in oil and higher values indicating greater solubility in water. While what constitutes a high HLB may vary by surfactant, a surfactant with a high HLB value would generally have a HLB value in water of at least about 20.

According to some embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.01 wt. % surfactant. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.05 wt. % or 0.3 wt. % surfactant.

According to some embodiments, the ink may comprise a humectant. If a humectant is used, it may be selected so that it will have an E_T(30) value within the range discussed above for the cosolvent. Particularly, in some embodiments, a humectant may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of no more than about 45 kcal/mol. According to some embodiments, a humectant may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of at least about 25 kcal/mol. According to some of these embodiments, a humectant may be selected such that it has an E_T(30) value of at least about 30 kcal/mol or at least about 35 kcal/mol. According to some embodiments, the cosolvent that is selected serves as a humectant.

According to some embodiments, the dye-based ink comprises up to about 25 wt. % humectant. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 15 wt. % or up to about 5 wt. % humectant. According to some embodiments, the dye-based ink does not comprise any humectant.

The ink may comprise biocide to suppress growth of microorganisms. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 5 wt. % biocide. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 2 or up to about 1 wt. % biocide. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.1 wt. % biocide. According to some of the embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.2 wt. % or at least about 0.5 wt. % biocide. Exemplary biocides include Nuosept 95, available from Huls America (Piscataway, N.J.); Proxel GXL, available from Zeneca (Wilmington, Del.); and glutaraldehyde, available from Union Carbide Company (Bound Brook, N.J.) under the trade designation Ucarcide 250.

The ink may comprise buffer/pH control agent to control the pH of the ink. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 10 wt. % buffer or other pH control agent. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 2 wt. % or up to about 1 wt. % buffer. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.1 wt. % buffer or other pH control agent. According to some of the embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.2 wt. % or at least about 0.5 wt. % buffer. Exemplary buffers include Trizma Base, available from companies such as Aldrich Chemical (Milwaukee, Wis.), 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES), and 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS).

The ink may comprise an anti-kogation agent to reduce kogation of the ink. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 5 wt. % anti-kogation agent. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises up to about 2 wt. % or up to about 1 wt. % anti-kogation agent. According to some embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.1 wt. % anti-kogation agent. According to some of the embodiments, the ink comprises at least about 0.2 wt. % or at least about 0.5 wt. % anti-kogation agent.

The ink may comprise a metal chelator to bind transition metal cations that may be present in the ink. Exemplary metal chelators include ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexanetetraacetic acid (CDTA), (ethylenedioxy) diethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EGTA), or other chelators that can bind transition metal cations.

According to some embodiments, the ink comprises no more than about 15 wt. % performance enhancing additives (e.g. biocide, pH control agent, metal chelating agent, and anti-kogation agent). According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises no more than about 5 wt. % performance enhancing additives. According to some of these embodiments, the ink comprises no more than about 2 wt. % performance enhancing additives.

The dye-based inks described above may be configured for use in conjunction with a fluid deposition system that deposits the ink on a medium to form an image. In some embodiments, the dye-based inks described above may be configured for use in an ink jet printer.

There are various methods which may be utilized to control the deposition of ink droplets on the image-recording element to yield the desired image. In one process, known as continuous ink jet printing, a continuous stream of droplets is charged and deflected in an imagewise manner onto the surface of the image-recording element, while unimaged droplets are caught and returned to an ink sump. In another process, known as drop-on-demand ink jet printing, individual ink droplets are projected as needed onto the image-recording element to form the desired image. Common methods of controlling the projection of ink droplets in drop-on-demand printing include piezoelectric transducers and thermal bubble formation. Ink jet printers have found broad applications across markets ranging from industrial labeling to short run printing to desktop document and pictorial imaging.

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates fluid deposition system 10 configured to deposit a fluid 12 upon a medium 14. Fluid 12 comprises a liquid material such as ink which creates an image upon medium 14. In other applications, fluid 12 may include or carry non-imaging materials, wherein system 10 is utilized to precisely and accurately distribute, proportion and locate materials along medium 14.

Medium 14 comprises a structure upon which fluid 12 is to be deposited. Medium 14 may comprise a sheet or roll of a cellulose based or polymeric based material, structures which are more three dimensional in shape, textiles, wood, plastic, and/or some other medium upon which fluid 12 can be deposited.

According to some embodiments, a fluid deposition system may be configured to deposit inks of more than one color. According to some embodiments, a black ink of the fluid deposition system is comprised of one of a dye-based ink and a pigment-based ink, and a non-black ink (i.e. a colored ink such as red, blue, yellow, etc.) of the fluid deposition system is comprised of the other of a dye-based ink and a pigment based ink. According to some of these embodiments, the black ink comprises a dye-based ink and the non-black ink comprises a pigment-based ink. Particularly, in some embodiments, the black dye-based ink is formulated as discussed above.

The following examples are presented to illustrate the present embodiments and to assist one of ordinary skill in making and using the same. The examples are not intended in any way to limit the scope of the claims.

EXAMPLE 1

An ink comprises,

• a) 8 wt % of 1-(2-ethylhydroxy)-2-pyrrolidinone
• b) 8 wt % of 2-pyrrolidinone
• c) up to 1 wt % of ink jet ink additives such as biocides, buffers, and surfactants
• d) 4 wt. % Direct Black 168
• e) the balance water

EXAMPLE 2

An ink comprises,

• a) 8 wt % of 1-(2-ethylhydroxy)-2-pyrrolidinone
• b) 8 wt % 3-pyridylcarbinol
• c) up to 1 wt % of ink jet ink additives such as biocides, buffers, and surfactants
• d) 4 wt. % Direct Black 168
• e) the balance water

EXAMPLE 3

An ink comprises,

• a) 8 wt % of 1-(2-ethylhydroxy)-2-pyrrolidinone
• b) 8 wt % of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)morpholine
• c) up to 1 wt % of ink jet ink additives such as biocides, buffers, and surfactants
• d) 4 wt. % Direct Black 168
• e) the balance water

EXAMPLE 4

An ink comprises,

• a) 8.0 wt % 2-pyrrolidinone
• b) 8.0 wt % 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone
• c) 0.1 wt % biocide
• d) 0.2 wt % buffer (which can be MES, Trizma, or MOPS)
• e) 4.0 wt % anionic black dye

EXAMPLE 5

An ink comprises,

• a) 8.0 wt % 2-pyrrolidinone
• b) 0.1 wt % biocide
• c) 0.2 wt % buffer (which can be MES, Trizma, or MOPS)
• d) 4.0 wt % anionic black dye

EXAMPLE 6

Referring to FIG. 2, a plurality of dye-based inks were printed on plain paper and optical density was measured for each sample using HP plain paper.

Ink	Cosolvent	Dye
A	15 wt. % 3-(3-Me-pyridylamino)-	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
	propionitrile
B	15 wt. % Dantocol DHE	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
C	15 wt. % 3-Me-1,5-pentanediol	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
D	15 wt. % Dowanol TPM	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
E	15 wt. % Dowanol PnB	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
F	15 wt. % 1,2-hexanediol	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
G	10 wt. % 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
	2-pyrrolidinone
	10 wt. % 2-pyrrolidinone
H	7.5 wt. % 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
	2-pyrrolidinone
	7.5 wt. % 2-pyrrolidinone
I	6 wt. % 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-	4 wt. % of Direct Black 168
	2-pyrrolidinone
	6 wt. % 2-pyrrolidinone

As can be seen in FIG. 2, Inks G, H, and I have optical densities of at least 1.4. As can also be seen, the optical density of the formulations of inks G, H, and I decreased as the amount of cosolvent increased.

EXAMPLE 7

Referring to FIG. 3, the print quality (PQ) of three inks were measured. Ink 1 is an ink formulation according to example 4. Ink 2 is an exemplary traditional dye-based ink (not formulated as discussed above), sold for use with the Epson 870 printer. Ink 3 is an exemplary pigment based ink, sold for use with the 800 and 900 series HP Deskjet.

PQ scores were measured by comparison to known samples. The maximum score of 10 is given to output from a Laser printer. Pigment-based blacks, like those used in the HP800 and 900 series or the Lexmark Z22/23 printers, which are judged to have high print quality commonly score higher than 7. To show paper independence, print quality is scored over a selection of “plain” papers. Inks 1, 2, and 3 were printed using an ink jet printer.

PQ scores (y-axis) are shown for the three different inks over such a selection of papers (X-axis). The papers used in this example include HP BrightWhite 80 Gsm A4, Datacopy 80 Gsm A4, Rey Matt (Intercopy) 80 Gsm A4, Stein Beis Recyconomic 80 Gsm A4, HP BrightWhite 24# A, HP Printing 80 Gsm A4, HP Everyday Ink jet 80 Gsm A4, Conqueror Wove Brilliant 100 Gsm A4, Hokuetsu Kin Mari 64 Gsm A4, Golden Star 80 Gsm A4, SFI PPC 70 Gsm A4, HP Everyday Copy & Printing 21# A, Navigator Soporset Pre Print 80 Gsm A4, Gilbert Bond, 25% cotton, 20# A, Classic Laid Imaging 20#, HP Multipurpose 20# A, Multicopy 80 Gsm A4, Great White 20# A, HP Printing 22# A, Sunace 64 Gsm A4, Hansol PPC 85 Gsm A4, Kodak BrightWhite 20# A, Double A 80 Gsm A4, Microprint Multisystems 20# A, Hammermill Copy Plus 20# A, Kym Copy/Copy Stat 80 Gsm A4, HP Office 80 Gsm A4, PaperOne All Purpose—Blue 80 Gsm A4, and Flagship 70 Gsm A4.

As can be seen in FIG. 3, Ink 1 (the dye-based ink as described in this application) has about the same print quality as Ink 3 (a pigment-based ink), while Ink 2 (a traditional dye-based ink) does not have at least about the same print quality as Ink 3. Rather, Ink 2 has a significantly lower print quality than Ink 3.

Based on observations of inks formulated according to various examples according to the present disclosure, results similar to those of Ink 1 should be achievable using various black dyes in combination with any of the specific cosolvents listed above.

Illustrative Embodiments

A number of illustrative embodiments of the dye-based inks, and applications incorporating such inks are discussed herein. The embodiments described are intended to provide illustrative examples of the present additives and uses and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.

One embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises a dye and a solvent. The dye-based ink has a high print quality on plain paper.

Another embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises a dye and a cosolvent. All cosolvent in the ink consists essentially of cosolvent having an E_T(30) value of about 25 kcal/mol to about 45 kcal/mol.

An additional embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises a dye and cosolvent. The cosolvent in the ink consists essentially of cosolvent selected from a group consisting of 2-pyrrolidinone, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone, 3-pyridylcarbinol, 4-pyridylcarbinol, 3-(3-pyridylamino)-propionitrile, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-morpholine, 4-hydroxy-1-methyl-piperidine, and combinations thereof.

Another embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises about 0.1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % dye, about 6 wt. % to about 20 wt. % cosolvent, up to about 0.5 wt. % high HLB surfactant, and up to about 15 wt. % additives selected from a group consisting of biocides, pH control agents, anti-kogation agents, and combinations thereof. All cosolvent in the ink consists essentially of cosolvent having an E_T(30) value of about 25 kcal/mol to about 45 kcal/mol.

Another embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises a dye and a solvent. The ink has an optical density of at least about 1.45 on plain paper.

Another embodiment is directed to a dye-based ink. The ink comprises a dye and a solvent. The dye-based ink has an edge acuity and optical density at least about the same as a pigment-based in having a high print quality.

An additional embodiment is directed to a method for forming an image using a fluid deposition system. The method comprises depositing a dye-based ink on a medium, the dye-based ink being a black ink, and depositing a pigment-based ink on a medium, the pigment-based ink being a non-black ink. The dye-based ink has a high print quality on plain paper and has a print quality on plain paper at least similar to the pigment-based ink.

Another embodiment is directed to a fluid supply. The fluid supply comprises a reservoir, the reservoir containing a dye-based ink. The dye-based ink may be formulated according to any of the above listed illustrative embodiments.

Another embodiment is directed to a fluid deposition system. The system comprises a fluid-dispensing device configured to dispense fluid upon a medium; and a fluid supply including a reservoir. The reservoir comprises an interior in fluid communication with a fluid-dispensing device, the reservoir containing a dye-based ink. The dye-based ink may be formulated according to any of the above listed illustrative embodiments.

Another embodiment is directed to a composition. The composition comprises a media having an image printed on the media. The image is formed by a black dye and has a high print quality. Print quality may be judged by comparison to a similar image printed on a similar media using a pigment from a pigment-based ink known to have a high print quality on plain paper. The media may be plain paper.

For each of the above listed inks, the ink may be a black ink or may be a non-black ink. For each of the fluid supplies discussed above, the fluid supply may be configured for use with an ink jet printer. For each of the fluid deposition systems discussed above, the fluid deposition system may comprise an ink jet printer.

The invention has been described with reference to various specific and illustrative embodiments and techniques. However, it should be understood that many variations and modifications may be made while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention. For instance, the listed dyes and cosolvents are exemplary only and do not represent an exhaustive list. Further, while the examples only show the use of a single dye in a given ink, an ink may be composed of more than one dye.

1. A dye-based ink, comprising: a dye and cosolvent; wherein the cosolvent in the ink consists essentially of cosolvent selected from a group consisting of 3-(3-pyridylamino)-propionitrile, 4-hydroxy-1-methyl-piperidine, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)morpholine, and combinations thereof.

2. The dye-based ink of claim 1, further comprising: one or more high HLB surfactants in an amount from about 0.05 wt. % to about 1 wt. %; wherein the dye-based ink has a high print quality on plain paper.

3. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the ink has a print quality on plain paper at least similar to a pigment-based ink having a high print quality on plain paper.

4. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the ink comprises about 5 wt. % to about 20 wt. % cosolvent.

5. The dye-based ink of claim 1, wherein the ink comprises between about 0.3 wt. % and about 0.5 wt. % high HLB surfactants.

6. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the dye is anionic.

7. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the ink is a black ink.

8. The dye-based ink of claim 2, further comprising a humectant having an E_T(30) value of about 30 kcal/mol to about 45 kcal/mol.

9. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.3 on plain paper.

10. The dye-based ink of claim 2, wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.4 on plain paper.

11. The dye-based ink of claim 1, further comprising: between about 0.05 wt. % and about 1 wt. % high HLB surfactants.

12. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the ink comprises no more than about 20 wt. % cosolvent.

13. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the ink comprises about 8 wt. % to about 16 wt. % cosolvent.

14. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the ink is a black ink.

15. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.3 on plain paper.

16. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.45 on plain paper.

17. The dye-based ink of claim 11, wherein the dye-based ink has a high print quality on plain paper.

18. The dye-based ink of claim 1, wherein the ink comprises about 5 wt. % to about 20 wt. % cosolvent.

19. The dye-based ink of claim 1, wherein the ink comprises about 8 wt. % to about 16 wt. % cosolvent.

20. The dye-based ink of claim 1, wherein the dye-based ink has a print quality on plain paper at least similar to a pigment-based ink having a high print quality on plain paper.

21. The dye-based ink of claim 1, wherein the dye-based ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.3 on plain paper.

22. The dye-based ink of claim 1, further comprising: from about 0.1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % dye; from about 5 wt. % to about 20 wt. % cosolvent; from about 0.05 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % high HLB surfactant; and up to about 15 wt. % additives selected from a group consisting of biocides, pH control agents, anti-kogation agents, and combinations thereof; wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.3 on plain paper.

23. The dye-based ink of claim 22, wherein the ink comprises; about 0.1 wt. % to about 6 wt. % dye; and about 8 wt. % to about 16 wt. % cosolvent.

24. The dye-based ink of claim 23, wherein the ink comprises: up to about 0.25 wt. % high HLB surfactant; and up to about 2 wt. % additives selected from a group consisting of biocides, pH control agents, anti-kogation agents, and combinations thereof.

25. The dye-based ink of claim 22, wherein the dye-based ink has a print quality on plain paper at least similar to a pigment-based ink having a high print quality on plain paper.

26. The dye-based ink of claim 22, wherein the ink is a black ink.

27. The dye-based ink of claim 22, wherein the dye comprises an anionic dye.

28. The dye-based ink of claim 1, further comprising: a humectant having an E_T(30) value of about 30 kcal/mol to about 45 kcal/mol; and between about 0.05 wt. % and about 1 wt. % high HLB surfactants, wherein the ink is configured to have an optical density of at least about 1.3 on plain paper.

29. The dye-based ink of claim 28, wherein the dye comprises at least about 2 wt. %.

30. The dye-based ink of claim 28, wherein the ink omits pigments.