Our innovation consulting team unites industry-leading expertise with premier patent software and solutions to provide the most comprehensive innovation consulting services available for your business. Using our IP Suite, we work with you to analyze complex problems, develop new ideas, map them to understand novelty and create an in-depth landscape report.
COnsulting Services
Our Consulting Methodology
IP.com’s Enterprise Innovation Consulting Services facilitate one- and two-day onsite sessions, working with R&D teams to provide an end-to-end solution. Our consulting methodology results in invigorating innovation and the achievement of a set of new actionable ideas for further exploration.
Our Tools & Solutions
We utilize a set of our patented AI-based tools to analyze existing solutions or complex technical problems, develop new solutions and ideas, map them to understand novelty, and develop an in-depth technology landscape report. The innovation consulting team prepares the entire agenda, guides the use of tools within your team, provides on-site instruction, and delivers results in a formal review.
Ready to get started?
COntact us to see how sERVICES from IP.COm® can enhance your innovation workflow
“*” indicates required fields
PATENT News & Resources
Meet the New InnovationQ: A Faster, Cleaner Way to Publish Defensively
Free Defensive Publishing Package giveaway in celebration of the new InnovationQ publishing workflow, making it easier than ever to produce clean, consistent, defensible disclosures the first time.
Leaning Into AI: What the USPTO’s ASAP! Pilot Means for the Future of Patent Examination
ASAP! represents not just another pilot, but a paradigm shift in how innovation is evaluated, refined, and ultimately protected with the ultimate goal of helping the US and many jurisdictions win the innovation race of our time.
AI Authorship Heads to the U.S. Supreme Court: Can Machines Hold Copyright?
A new petition before the U.S. Supreme Court could define the future of creative ownership in the age of artificial intelligence. At the center of the dispute is a deceptively simple question with sweeping implications: Can a work created autonomously by an AI system qualify for copyright protection under U.S. law?
